Map
Index
Random
Help
th

Quote: rewrote LINPACK in Java; Fortran-style Java code was 4x slower than original; Java with explicit base types was 4x or more slower; object-oriented Java was 19x to 140x slower on average

topics > all references > references a-b > QuoteRef: budiZ2_1999 , p. abstract



Topic:
interpreter
Topic:
efficiency

Quotation Skeleton

Our goal is to investigate how to make … polymorphic version and a "Lit" version designed for … [p. 90] The Lit OO style [with explicit base types] allows for … the elements directly. … [p. 92] In general, the execution times for Fortran … the factor of four of native Fortran code. … In general, the Lit OO version of OwlPack … Symantec JIT, to around 2.7 times slower for … [p. 93] The object oriented version was substantially slower … dqrsl and dgesl on jdk 1.2 on Solaris, … from a factor of 19 for the Solaris …   Google-1   Google-2

Copyright clearance needed for quotation.


Related Topics up

Topic: interpreter (59 items)
Topic: efficiency (96 items)

Copyright © 2002-2008 by C. Bradford Barber. All rights reserved.
Thesa is a trademark of C. Bradford Barber.