Map
Index
Random
Help
th

QuoteRef: searJR_1984

topics > all references > ThesaHelp: references sa-sz



ThesaHelp:
references sa-sz
Topic:
consciousness
Group:
meaning and truth
Topic:
recognition
Topic:
meaning vs. reference
Topic:
limitations of formalism
Topic:
philosophy of mind
Group:
relationship between brain and behavior
Topic:
people vs. computers
Topic:
intelligent machines
Topic:
limitations of artificial intelligence and cognitive science
Topic:
rules
Topic:
what is a computer
Topic:
phenomenology
Group:
psychology
Topic:
sociology
Group:
philosophy of science

Reference

Searle, J.R., Minds, Brains and Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 1984. Google

Quotations
15 ;;Quote: consciousness is amazing; it is the central fact of human existence; without it, the universe is meaningless
16 ;;Quote: intentionality is amazing, i.e., that mental states refer to the world; how can atoms in the void refer?
16 ;;Quote: how can subjective mental phenomena accord with an objective, scientific reality?
17 ;;Quote: mental phenomena appear to cause physical results; if not, then the mind doesn't matter, like froth on a wave
17 ;;Quote: the mind-body problem is difficult because of consciousness, intentionality, subjectivity, and mental causation; can not deny these
19 ;;Quote: everything that matters to our mental life is caused by the nervous system; no mental events from outside events that do not effect the brain
19 ;;Quote: the relationship between mind and brain is like liquidity and water; mind is a feature of brains and it is caused by them
31 ;;Quote: computer programs are syntactical, only minds have semantics and meanings; e.g., Chinese room
35 ;;Quote: if you could build a machine, a physical system, just like a human, it would think
37 ;;Quote: a weather simulation is certainly not weather; why do we think that a computer simulation of the mind could think?
39 ;;Quote: a computer program can not give a system a mind
46 ;;Quote: to follow a rule, the meaning of the rule must have a causal role; behavior itself is insufficient (many possible rules)
47 ;;Quote: computers don't follow rules, they only act as if they did
47+;;Quote: human beings often don't follow rules
52 ;;Quote: we effortlessly recognize faces; perhaps it is like making a footprint in sand (hard to simulate)
57 ;;Quote: the same bodily movements could be a dance, signaling, or exercise; and one type of action could be done by many different movements
58 ;;Quote: human actions have preferred descriptions; what someone does is what they think they are doing; e.g., walking to Hyde Park
58 ;;Quote: people generally know what they are doing and can explain the behavior of others, perhaps through mastery of a set of principles
62 ;;Quote: human action has a mental, intentional component and a physical component; it is explained by intentional causation
63 ;;Quote: can experimentally separate the mental component of action from the physical component; e.g., by stimulating the motor cortex
65 ;;Quote: intentional, human actions are either premeditated or they are spontaneous, e.g., normal conversation
65 ;;Quote: practical reasoning is about choosing between conflicting desires; beliefs are about how to satisfy our desires
66 ;;Quote: the preferred description of intentional action is determined by the intentions that caused it; not like other, natural events
67 ;;Quote: intentional states only function as part of a network of intentions that determines the conditions of satisfaction
68 ;;Quote: the network of intentionality functions against a background of human capacities that are not themselves mental states; e.g., driving
78 ;;Quote: many social and psychological phenomena exist because we think they do; e.g., marriage, money, trade unions; unlike biology or physics
78 ;;Quote: strict laws of social sciences are impossible because social phenomena have no physical limits on possible realizations; e.g., money, war
80 ;;Quote: mental events are not particular, neuro-physiological processes because an event, e.g., money, has too much physical variability
96 ;;Quote: the experience of freedom of choice is an intrinsic part of intentional action; can not be given up
98 ;;Quote: in general, our commonsense, mentalistic conception of ourselves is consistent with nature as a physical system
98+;;Quote: radical freedom of will is impossible under a scientific world view
98+;;Quote: we cannot discover that we do not have minds with conscious, subjective mental states, nor that we do not at least try to engage in voluntary action


Related Topics up

ThesaHelp: references sa-sz (237 items)
Topic: consciousness (57 items)
Group: meaning and truth   (18 topics, 627 quotes)
Topic: recognition (50 items)
Topic: meaning vs. reference (49 items)
Topic: limitations of formalism (92 items)
Topic: philosophy of mind (74 items)
Group: relationship between brain and behavior   (9 topics, 315 quotes)
Topic: people vs. computers (54 items)
Topic: intelligent machines (28 items)
Topic: limitations of artificial intelligence and cognitive science (64 items)
Topic: rules (43 items)
Topic: what is a computer (62 items)
Topic: phenomenology (37 items)
Group: psychology   (9 topics, 303 quotes)
Topic: sociology (11 items)
Group: philosophy of science   (10 topics, 377 quotes)

Collected barberCB 11/93
Copyright © 2002-2008 by C. Bradford Barber. All rights reserved.
Thesa is a trademark of C. Bradford Barber.