| 
|
QuoteRef: adamK10_2006
Topic:
virtualized hardware
Topic:
hardware vs. software
Topic:
just-in-time compilation
Reference
Adams, K., Agesen, O., "A comparison of software and hardware techniques for x86 virtualization", ACM Symposium on Programming, Languages, and Systems (ASPLOS'06), San Jose, California, USA, October 2006, pp. 2-13. Google
abstract ;;Quote: software VMM performs better than hardware VMM due to high VMM/guest transition costs and a rigid programming model; software VMM replaces traps with callouts
4 ;;Quote: implement a software virtual machine with binary input, code translation on execute to user-mode instructions, dynamic adjustments
4 ;;Quote: VMM translates guest instructions to short, basic block, code fragments; chain fragments together in the translation cache
11 ;;Quote: use a hardware-walked, nested page table for VMMs; translates guest virtual addresses to host physical addresses; fast guest context switches and slightly slower TLB misses
Topic: virtualized hardware (5 items)
Topic: hardware vs. software (15 items)
Topic: just-in-time compilation (20 items)