Map
Index
Random
Help
th

QuoteRef: cobbRH11_1990

topics > all references > ThesaHelp: references c-d



ThesaHelp:
references c-d
Group:
engineering
Group:
software engineering
Topic:
software review
Group:
testing
Group:
debugging
Topic:
sensitivity of software to change
Topic:
incremental testing
Topic:
program proof via assertions
Topic:
statistical testing based on a usage profile
Topic:
relational database
Topic:
referential transparency
Topic:
Cleanroom software development
Topic:
requirement specification by function
Topic:
declarative vs. procedural representation
Topic:
state
Topic:
stepwise refinement
Topic:
requirement specification by diagrams
Topic:
data-driven design
Topic:
design documentation
Group:
program proving

Reference

Cobb, R.H., Mills, H.D., "Engineering software under statistical quality control", IEEE Software, 7, 11, pp. 44-54, November 1990. Google

Quotations
45 ;;Quote: programmers should be required to use engineering practices that prevent latent execution failures
45+;;Quote: via functional verification inspections, the IBM Wheelwriter had no software errors after 6 years; 63 Kloc of code on three processors
46 ;;Quote: unit verification by debugging may cause design faults when the fixed modules are combined
46 ;;Quote: in most cases, the cause of a software product failure was introduced while fixing another failure
47 ;;Quote: functional verification structures a proof that a program implements its specification correctly
47 ;;Quote: functional verification leaves 2-5 fixes/Kloc for later phases compared to 10-30 fixes/Kloc from unit testing
48 ;;Quote: statistical usage testing is 21 times more effective than coverage testing because most errors are seldom observed
49 ;;Quote: Codd developed relational databases to solve data-maintenance abnormalities due to failures in referential transparency
49 ;;Quote: Cleanroom engineering uses teams for specification, development, and certification
50 ;;Quote: an internal specification defines responses in terms of stimuli histories; avoids commitment to an implementation
50+;;Quote: representing prior stimuli by state data (invented abstractions) specifies an implementation
51 ;;Quote: statistical testing by selecting tests according to a usage profile
51+;;Quote: develop an expected usage profile with a Markov model on usage states and estimated transition probabilities
51 ;;Quote: should have user-level commands for each increment in a construction plan; top-down, no special testing routines, helps estimate MTTF
51 ;;Quote: Cleanroom's development team designs each increment top-down with usage hierarchy, black-box, state-box, and clear-box
51+;;Quote: Cleanroom's development team implements clear boxes by stepwise refinement and verifies each function
51 ;;Quote: Cleanroom's black-box view defines system responses in terms of stimuli histories; implementation-independent
51 ;;Quote: Cleanroom's state-box view defines system responses in terms of state data and the current stimuli; data-driven, captures stimuli history
51 ;;Quote: Cleanroom's clear-box view defines system responses in terms of lower level black boxes, data abstractions for states, and current stimuli; process-driven
51 ;;Quote: both data (state-boxes) and process (clear-boxes) views are needed for designing software; related by box structures
51 ;;Quote: verify state-box descriptions by eliminating references to state data; should match the original black-box function
52 ;;Quote: verify clear-box descriptions by eliminating references to lower level black boxes; should match the original state-box function
52 ;;Quote: verify the expansion of a clear-box into code by constructing a proof argument that the expansion matches the functional specification
52+;;Quote: using Cleanroom techniques, can construct proof arguments for very large software systems
53 ;;Quote: Cleanroom's certification team adds an increment to previous increments and measures its MTTF with random test cases
53+;;Quote: Cleanroom's certification team estimates MTTF for the next version; force a redesign if failures are too frequent or serious


Related Topics up

ThesaHelp: references c-d (337 items)
Group: engineering   (30 topics, 302 quotes)
Group: software engineering   (18 topics, 463 quotes)
Topic: software review (80 items)
Group: testing   (18 topics, 551 quotes)
Group: debugging   (10 topics, 325 quotes)
Topic: sensitivity of software to change (44 items)
Topic: incremental testing (25 items)
Topic: program proof via assertions (61 items)
Topic: statistical testing based on a usage profile (27 items)
Topic: relational database (34 items)
Topic: referential transparency (26 items)
Topic: Cleanroom software development (38 items)
Topic: requirement specification by function (20 items)
Topic: declarative vs. procedural representation (53 items)
Topic: state (35 items)
Topic: stepwise refinement (25 items)
Topic: requirement specification by diagrams (27 items)
Topic: data-driven design (41 items)
Topic: design documentation (43 items)
Group: program proving   (10 topics, 310 quotes)

Collected barberCB 1/91
Copyright © 2002-2008 by C. Bradford Barber. All rights reserved.
Thesa is a trademark of C. Bradford Barber.