Map
Index
Random
Help
th

QuoteRef: winoT_1986

topics > all references > ThesaHelp: references t-z



ThesaHelp:
references t-z
Topic:
natural language as action or problem solving
Topic:
meaning by social context
Topic:
management
Topic:
limitations of artificial intelligence and cognitive science
Topic:
knowledge representation
Topic:
software models of reality
Topic:
phenomenology
Topic:
limitations of formalism
Topic:
sense perception
Topic:
evolutionary systems
Topic:
self-regulating systems
Topic:
commitment
Topic:
private language argument for skepticism about meaning
Topic:
rules
Topic:
science as experiment
Topic:
denoting phrases and definite descriptions
Group:
coordination system
Topic:
commitment as a system
Topic:
responsibility
Topic:
computer as an intelligent agent
Group:
programming
Topic:
computer as state machine
Topic:
decomposition of a system into levels
Topic:
philosophy of mind
Topic:
abstraction in programming
Topic:
programming with forms
Topic:
knowledge representation by frames
Topic:
organizations as systems
Topic:
tools
Topic:
direct engagement and theater in a user interface
Topic:
civilization and society

Reference

Winograd, T., Flores, F., Understanding Computers and Cognition, Norwood, New Jersey, Ablex Publishing, 1986. Google

Quotations
10 ;;Quote: speech act theory--language and thought is ultimately based on social interaction
20 ;;Quote: rational decision making--list alternative strategies, determine the consequences, and pick the best
20+;;Quote: actual behavior must depart from rational decision making because can't determine all alternatives or consequences
22 ;;Quote: artificial intelligence research follows the rational decision making model
22+;;Quote: artificial intelligence represents the task environment with a symbolic structure and a systematic correspondence
27 ;;Quote: hermeneutics begin as the theory of interpretation of sacred texts; asking why does a text have meaning despite different cultures and language
28 ;;Quote: a school of hermeneutics takes interpretation as primary; gives meaning to a text, determines our language and ourselves
31 ;;Quote: separating subject from object denies the fundamental unity of being-in-the-world (Dasein, the primacy of experience)
32 ;;Quote: the hermeneutic circle--our beliefs can not be made explicit because we are always operating within their framework
33 ;;Quote: when hammering a nail, one does not need an explicit representation of the hammer; the ability to act comes first
33 ;;Quote: skeptical about knowledge representation even though it is fundamental to cognitive science, linguistics and artificial intelligence
34 ;;Quote: cannot avoid acting, every representation is an interpretation, language is action
36 ;;Quote: objects and properties are not inherent; they arise in an event of breaking down
36 ;;Quote: for the person engaged in the throwness of unhampered hammering, the hammer does not exist as an entity
37 ;;Quote: it is meaningless to discuss objects in the absence of concernful activity with a potential for breaking down
37+;;Quote: reality is a space of potential for human concern and action; not defined by objective, omniscient observer
40 ;;Quote: we introduce Maturana's terminology without giving definitions; precise definitions are impossible anyway
41 ;;Quote: Maturna, et. al. demonstrated that the visual system responded to patterns of local variations, e.g., dark spots; not direct representation
42 ;;Quote: perception--the nervous system generates phenomena rather than acting as a filter on reality; like hallucination
45 ;;Quote: living things (autopoietic) are structure-determined systems with the potential of disintegration; leads to adaptation and evolution
59 ;;Quote: every language act has consequences; immediate actions and commitments for future action; if breakdown in commitment than a dialog
63 ;;Quote: we are each responsible for the consequences of how our acts will be understood within our shared tradition; despite lack of rules
67 ;;Quote: scientific objectivity when for any observation we can provide instructions that will lead to the same conclusion
68 ;;Quote: much of what we say is based on what others told us; e.g., our belief that Napoleon was the Emperor of France
68 ;;Quote: meaning arises in the commitment expressed in speech acts
71 ;;Quote: if action is primary, than computers should participate in speech acts that create commitments
76 ;;Quote: language is action, not communication; the basis of language is commitment within a social structure
76 ;;Quote: computers are incapable of making commitments and hence cannot enter into language
84 ;;Quote: a program is a program about something; it has a systematic correspondence to reality
86 ;;Quote: representation is in the mind of the beholder; nothing in the computer or program depends on the representation selected
86 ;;Quote: digital computers allow many representational layers; a variable may represent a satellite and in turn be represented by a voltage
109 ;;Quote: artificial intelligence models of language are generally equivalent to older philosophical models
115 ;;Quote: a new situation invokes a frame from memory; includes expectations and assumptions; modify as needed
121 ;;Quote: ELIZA will respond "How long have you been swallowing poison?" instead of responding appropriately
137 ;;Quote: a limited imitation of intelligence will intrude with incomprehensible breakdowns
150 ;;Quote: organizations are networks of commitments
158 ;;Quote: the core of an organization is networks of recurrent conversations for meeting requests and contingencies
159 ;;Quote: perform a speech act using the coordinator by selecting the illocutionary force, the propositional content, and temporal relationships
159+;;Quote: the basic conversational building-blocks include request/promise, offer/accept, and report/acknowledge
161 ;;Quote: a person can specify a recurrent pattern of speech acts to be performed by the coordinator
161 ;;Quote: the coordinator only deals with the systematic aspect of language (i.e., commitments) that is crucial for coordination
162 ;;Quote: day-to-day people are blind to the pervasiveness of commitment; need education for communicative competence
164 ;;Quote: a transparency of interaction is crucial in the design of tool, e.g., controls for a car; don't mimic human faculties
176 ;;Quote: a human society operates through requests and promises that form a network of commitments; can computerize the conversations for action
176+;;Quote: communication is a process of commitment and interpretation, not one of transmitting information or symbols

103 ;;Quote: a conversation for action is a succession of states starting with a directive and ending with performance or rejection
103 ;;Quote: coordination by conversations about the action, conversations triggered by break downs, and conversations during the action


Related Topics up

ThesaHelp: references t-z (309 items)
Topic: natural language as action or problem solving (29 items)
Topic: meaning by social context (33 items)
Topic: management (27 items)
Topic: limitations of artificial intelligence and cognitive science (64 items)
Topic: knowledge representation (39 items)
Topic: software models of reality (22 items)
Topic: phenomenology (37 items)
Topic: limitations of formalism (92 items)
Topic: sense perception (52 items)
Topic: evolutionary systems (38 items)
Topic: self-regulating systems (23 items)
Topic: commitment (31 items)
Topic: private language argument for skepticism about meaning (33 items)
Topic: rules (43 items)
Topic: science as experiment (38 items)
Topic: denoting phrases and definite descriptions (21 items)
Group: coordination system   (8 topics, 214 quotes)
Topic: commitment as a system (22 items)
Topic: responsibility (12 items)
Topic: computer as an intelligent agent (49 items)
Group: programming   (339 topics, 10050 quotes)
Topic: computer as state machine (20 items)
Topic: decomposition of a system into levels (49 items)
Topic: philosophy of mind (74 items)
Topic: abstraction in programming (67 items)
Topic: programming with forms (26 items)
Topic: knowledge representation by frames (18 items)
Topic: organizations as systems (28 items)
Topic: tools (20 items)
Topic: direct engagement and theater in a user interface (35 items)
Topic: civilization and society (18 items)

Collected barberCB 11/83 5/87
Copyright © 2002-2008 by C. Bradford Barber. All rights reserved.
Thesa is a trademark of C. Bradford Barber.