Group: natural language
Group: philosophy
Topic: absolute vs. relative names
Topic: authentication
Topic: causal theory of names
Topic: entities
Topic: meaning vs. reference
Topic: names as rigid designators
Topic: names independent of objects
Topic: naming by pointing or recognition
Topic: referential transparency
Topic: symbolic representation
Topic: unique numeric names as surrogates
Topic: using a description as a name
Topic: words in natural languages
| |
Summary
A proper name designates a single object without other signification or meaning. Proper names isolate the referring function of language from its describing function. A proper name is a peg on which to hang descriptions. All human languages distinguish proper names from common names.
Do not use proper names as the primary identifier for records. (cbb 12/00)
Subtopic: proper name as an object
Quote: a proper name designates a single object; its sense is grasped by any speaker of the language [»fregG_1892]
| Quote: proper names have no signification; they do not convey any information about an object
| Quote: a proper name is but an unmeaning mark for knowing that an assertion applies to something with which we were previously acquainted [»millJS_1843, OK]
| Quote: proper names denote individuals, but they do not imply any attributes; they are not connotative [»millJS_1843, OK]
| Quote: proper names refer publicly to objects without having to agree on what description identifies an object [»searJR_1958]
| Quote: proper names exist because we need to make repeated references to the same object, even if not present [»searJR_1983]
| Quote: all human languages distinguish proper names from common nouns; names learned very quickly; fundamental to identification [»sowaJF_1984]
| Subtopic: name of an individual
Quote: a name is a symbol or combination of symbols by which an entity is known [»senkME1_1973]
| Quote: a name is a simple symbol that directly designates an individual
| Quote: direct manipulation needs easily reproducible symbols for entities; text is best, that's its purpose [»diseAA_1986]
| Quote: if maintenance of old versions is required during development, side branches are needed; symbolic version names should be used [»tichWF9_1982]
| Quote: use spies to learn the names of all involved [»tzuS_180]
| Subtopic: sense -- how does a proper name refer?
Quote: how does a proper name refer to an object? [»searJR_1983]
| Quote: the sense of a proper name is the definite description associated with the name [»searJR_1983]
| Quote: for proper names, sense is necessary but reference is contingent; they look like shorthand or a vague description [»searJR_1958]
| Quote: does a name refer because an object fits a description or because of facts that are independent of description [»searJR_1983]
| Quote: proper names such as 'Aristotle' may have varying senses; should be avoided in science and perfect languages [»fregG_1892]
| Note: consider Nextperson as a proper name; its description fixes its reference but does not give its meaning; i.e., contingent, a priori truth [»kripSA_1980, OK]
| Quote: proper names isolate the referring function from the describing function of language
| Quote: proper names are logically connected with descriptions but they are not used to describe; so proper names sort of have a sense [»searJR_1958]
| Quote: Mill's account of proper names as non-connotative simply says that they do refer, and that's that
| Quote: a proper name refers without presupposing a context; demonstratives and singular, referring expressions assume a context [»searJR_1958]
| Quote: proper names can have prominent uses not based on acquaintance; constrained regardless of chain of communication, e.g., 'Japan' could not refer to a butterfly [»searJR_1983]
| Quote: the most important names are for frequent, personal contacts; though learned from other people, a reference does not depend on others [»searJR_1983]
| Quote: can use a proper name even though no causal connection to an object; e.g., M Street in Washington or the names of numbers [»searJR_1983]
| Quote: an object is correlative with a proper name, singular term, or definite description [»dummM_1967]
| Subtopic: proper names as pegs for descriptions
Quote: proper names are pegs on which to hang descriptions
| Quote: 'Socrates is a man' identifies a named object with an ambiguously described object; i.e., the ambiguously described object actually exists [»russB_1919, OK]
| Note: "Cicero = Tully" informs people about a language; e.g., merge if names are clusters of characteristics [»searJR_1958, OK]
| Quote: a proper name presupposes the truth of unspecified, uniquely referring descriptive statements [»searJR_1958]
| Quote: the cat in "the cat is on the mat" does not refer to Tabby the cat even though the cat is Tabby [»martAP_1990]
| Subtopic: identity of a program
Quote: authenticated operation requires program identity; e.g., restrict access to financial data via cryptographic hash of executable code [»englP7_2003]
| Subtopic: avoid proper names as ID
Quote: even if people have the same legal name in a domain, pick unique names [»oppeDC7_1983]
| Quote: do not use proper names as the sole index to critical records; they serve many functions and create difficult problems [»normDA4_1993]
| Subtopic: individuals do not exist
Quote: an individual is an instance of something general; pure particulars do not exist [»stawPF_1954]
|
Related Topics
Group: natural language (16 topics, 539 quotes)
Group: philosophy (60 topics, 2323 quotes)
Topic: absolute vs. relative names (12 items)
Topic: authentication (93 items)
Topic: causal theory of names (21 items)
Topic: entities (20 items)
Topic: meaning vs. reference (49 items)
Topic: names as rigid designators (43 items)
Topic: names independent of objects (34 items)
Topic: naming by pointing or recognition (13 items)
Topic: referential transparency (26 items)
Topic: symbolic representation (26 items)
Topic: unique numeric names as surrogates (67 items)
Topic: using a description as a name (21 items)
Topic: words in natural languages (40 items)
|