Topic: access by current position
Topic: binding of names to objects
Topic: causal theory of names
Topic: current position in a user interface; cursor
Topic: data as a named set of data objects
Topic: definition by example
Topic: information retrieval by location
Topic: meaning vs. reference
Topic: mouse as the user interface
Topic: names as rigid designators
Topic: names defined by context
Topic: names independent of objects
Topic: number as a named set of numbers
Topic: objects without names
Topic: pointer machines
Topic: pointers to data
Topic: proper names
Topic: recognition
Topic: selecting with a mouse
Topic: unique names
Topic: using an address as a name
| |
Summary
Naming by pointing is a fundamental aspect of names. We point to someone in a crowded room when asked to identify a name. Pointing endures across other possible worlds. It acts as a rigid designator. But pointing is itself ambiguous. How do we know who or what is identified?
Perhaps recognition is the actual foundation for names. When someone is pointed out, we assume recognition, and in turn, will recognize that person. (cbb 4/06)
Subtopic: naming by pointing
Quote: can identify an object by pointing to it; this holds in other possible worlds [»kripSA_1980]
| Quote: refer to most things by a combination of pointing, noun phrases, and context [»kentW1_1984]
| Quote: naming by an initial 'baptism' and then passed from person to person with an intension to keep the reference fixed [»kripSA_1980]
| QuoteRef: quinWV_1950 ;;Identity, ostension, and hypostasis
| Subtopic: pointing is ambiguous
Quote: ostension is inherently ambiguous; "Is this the same as that?" [»dummM_1967]
| Quote: how does a child figure out what an adult is pointing at? an ostensive definition can always be variously interpreted [»pitkHF_1972]
| Quote: that a proper name can be learned simply by following a finger is a myth; e.g., what is pointed at? [»ziffP_1960]
| Subtopic: naming by recognition
Quote: recognizing an object may be a speaker's only "identifying description" [»searJR_1983]
| Note: identity is the abstraction of recognition [»cbb_2000, OK]
| Note: pointing is the abstraction of recognition; concrete yet elusive; what are you pointing at? [»cbb_2000, OK]
| Subtopic: naming as recall
Quote: names are marks of human voices which recall conceptions of the things named [»hobbT_1650, OK]
| Subtopic: naming by context
Quote: Pygmalion uses a three button mouse that depends on context; for cursor positioning and moving values [»smitDC6_1975, OK]
| Subtopic: problems with causal theory
Quote: the causal theory of names is incorrect; e.g., a tribe where every name is known by ostension and hence description [»searJR_1983]
|
Related Topics
Topic: access by current position (7 items)
Topic: binding of names to objects (19 items)
Topic: causal theory of names (21 items)
Topic: current position in a user interface; cursor (23 items)
Topic: data as a named set of data objects (22 items)
Topic: definition by example (26 items)
Topic: information retrieval by location (21 items)
Topic: meaning vs. reference (49 items)
Topic: mouse as the user interface (13 items)
Topic: names as rigid designators (43 items)
Topic: names defined by context (36 items)
Topic: names independent of objects (34 items)
Topic: number as a named set of numbers (15 items)
Topic: objects without names (7 items)
Topic: pointer machines (17 items)
Topic: pointers to data (55 items)
Topic: proper names (35 items)
Topic: recognition (50 items)
Topic: selecting with a mouse (44 items)
Topic: unique names (58 items)
Topic: using an address as a name (22 items)
|